An Analysis of Interaction Effects of China–South Korea and China– Australia FTAs and the Expanding TPP

Yuhong Sun (), Yifei Mu () and Yang Jun ()
Additional contact information
Yuhong Sun: Dongbei University of Finance & Economics, College of International Economics & Trade, China
Yifei Mu: Dongbei University of Finance & Economics, College of International Economics & Trade, China
Yang Jun: University of International Business and Economics, China

Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy, 2016, vol. 62, issue 4, 12-22

Abstract: On 5 October 2015, the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) led by the U.S. was signed. Already, 12 countries1 have joined the agreement, but China has not. Thus, lots of research has focused on the negative effect of the TPP on China’s foreign trade. On the other hand, China is moving forward in its own efforts to establish bilateral free trade agreements (FTAs) and free trade zones. In June 2015, China-South Korea and China-Australia signed bilateral FTAs which went into effect in December 2015. Several questions were raised: Since South Korea and Australia are the major trade partners in the Pacific area and the bilateral FTAs will be effective before the TPP, will these FTAs’ positive effects on China’s foreign trade offset some of the negative effects of the TPP? If China and the U.S. adopted a competitive trade policy, which countries would benefit? If China and the U.S. adopted a cooperative trade policy, how would the trade value and economic welfare change? This paper simulates and analyses the mutual effects of China-South Korea and China-Australia FTAs and the enlarging TPP using the computable general equilibrium model. The major conclusions drawn suggest that China-South Korea and China-Australia FTAs will significantly offset the TPP’s negative effect on China’s foreign trade. If China is not included, the U.S. economic benefit from the TPP will be limited. The economic welfare for a country like Australia, which joined both the bilateral FTA and the TPP, will be increased the most. In the long run, China joining the TPP would be the most beneficial decision for its national interest. However, if the TPP cannot be approved by the US congress, the U.S.’s economic indicators and export would be decreasing sharply. China’s economy and export will benefit from FTAs.

Keywords: China-South Korea FTA; China-Australia FTA; TPP; interaction effects (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/ngoe-2016-0020 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vrs:ngooec:v:62:y:2016:i:4:p:12-22:n:2

DOI: 10.1515/ngoe-2016-0020

Access Statistics for this article

Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy is currently edited by Vesna Čančer

More articles in Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy from Sciendo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().