EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Effects of air pollution abatement on financial performance of Texas cotton gins

S. Fuller, M. Gillis, C. Parnell, A. Ramaiyer and R. Childers
Additional contact information
S. Fuller: Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2124, Postal: Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2124
M. Gillis: Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2124, Postal: Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2124
C. Parnell: Department of Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, Postal: Department of Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University
A. Ramaiyer: Department of Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, Postal: Department of Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University
R. Childers: Department of Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, Postal: Department of Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University

Agribusiness, 1997, vol. 13, issue 5, 521-532

Abstract: The Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) amendments of 1990 strengthened air pollution regulation as it affects stationary sources such as cotton gins. The primary objective of this study is to determine likely success|failure rates for Texas gin plants that would result from introducing air pollution controls. Simulation analysis is carried out with firm financial models. The analysis projects many of the small and mid-size gin plant firms that operate at relatively low volume levels to be financially unsuccessful ex ante investment in air pollution controls. As expected, the introduction of air pollution control lowers the likelihood of firm success, but, the unfavorable effect of these required investments is less pronounced among larger gin plant firms and plants that operate at high capacity levels. Results suggest the introduction of air pollution controls will accelerate the trend toward fewer and larger gin plant firms, and in order to survive, many Texas firms will find it necessary to merge|consolidate. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Date: 1997
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:agribz:v:13:y:1997:i:5:p:521-532

DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6297(199709/10)13:5<521::AID-AGR6>3.0.CO;2-8

Access Statistics for this article

Agribusiness is currently edited by Ronald W. Cotterill

More articles in Agribusiness from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:13:y:1997:i:5:p:521-532