Media-specific returns to generic advertising: The case of catfish
Henry Kinnucan and
Yuliang Miao
Additional contact information
Yuliang Miao: Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849-5406, Postal: Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849-5406
Agribusiness, 1999, vol. 15, issue 1, 81-99
Abstract:
A key decision faced by managers of generic advertising programs is the allocation of the budget among media (e.g., television, radio, print). In this article, the economics of media allocation are addressed using catfish as a case study. The hypothesis that demand responds equally to all media was rejected. Further analysis indicated that the media with relatively modest expenditures (newspapers and television) had no reliable effect on demand, which suggests that scale is important. Losses sustained from the apparently ineffectual media were more than offset by gains from the effective media (magazines and radio), so that returns overall, net of opportunity cost, were positive. The historical media allocation, however, was inefficient in the sense that a different media mix would have resulted in greater industry profits. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Date: 1999
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:agribz:v:15:y:1999:i:1:p:81-99
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6297(199924)15:1<81::AID-AGR6>3.0.CO;2-D
Access Statistics for this article
Agribusiness is currently edited by Ronald W. Cotterill
More articles in Agribusiness from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().