Explaining the differences between two previous meat generic advertising studies

Nouhoun Coulibaly and B Brorsen
Additional contact information
Nouhoun Coulibaly: 08 BP 2333 Abidjan 08, Cote d'Ivoire, W. Africa, Postal: 08 BP 2333 Abidjan 08, Cote d'Ivoire, W. Africa

Agribusiness, 1999, vol. 15, issue 4, 501-515

Abstract: United States producer organizations spend millions of dollars on generic advertising of both beef and pork and other promotion programs designed to stimulate consumers' demand for meat. Producers need to know if the money allocated to generic advertising and these promotion programs is effective in increasing the demand for meat. Past research disagreed about the effectiveness of meat generic advertising. Models of Ward and Lambert and Brester and Schroeder are reestimated and tested for misspecification. The Ward and Lambert Model is shown to be fragile. The statistically significant effect of advertising disappears with minor changes in the data and with a change in the sample period. [Econ-Lit citations: Q110, M370, C530] © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Date: 1999
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:agribz:v:15:y:1999:i:4:p:501-515

DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6297(199923)15:4<501::AID-AGR6>3.0.CO;2-M

Access Statistics for this article

Agribusiness is currently edited by Ronald W. Cotterill

More articles in Agribusiness from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().