Price skewness and the marketing of finished cattle

C. Jack, Seamus McErlean (), D. Anderson and T. McCallion
Additional contact information
C. Jack: Department of Agricultural and Food Economics, The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, Northern Ireland, Postal: Department of Agricultural and Food Economics, The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, Northern Ireland
D. Anderson: Department of Agricultural and Food Economics, The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, Northern Ireland, Postal: Department of Agricultural and Food Economics, The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, Northern Ireland
T. McCallion: Department of Agricultural and Food Economics, The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, Northern Ireland, Postal: Department of Agricultural and Food Economics, The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, Northern Ireland

Agribusiness, 2000, vol. 16, issue 4, 471-484

Abstract: Incomplete information about product quality generates risk for market participants. The amount of information and perceived risk varies between marketing channels and an agent's attitude to this risk influences their choice of marketing channel. For risk-averse sellers, expected price and the associated price risk (dispersion) are relevant to their choice of marketing route. This paper examines how the choice of marketing channel by farmers selling finished cattle is influenced by their perceptions of expected market price and price variation. The study uses a unique dataset of “matched” animals, sold first in liveweight auction markets in Northern Ireland and subsequently to a meat packer. The findings indicate that price skewness also influences channel choice. The positive skewness exhibited by auction market prices combined with the negative skewness exhibited by meat packer prices may mean that some risk-averse individuals, faced with incomplete information about product quality, prefer the liveweight auction market to selling directly to meat packers [JEL Codes: Q110]. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Date: 2000
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:agribz:v:16:y:2000:i:4:p:471-484

DOI: 10.1002/1520-6297(200023)16:4<471::AID-AGR6>3.0.CO;2-K

Access Statistics for this article

Agribusiness is currently edited by Ronald W. Cotterill

More articles in Agribusiness from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().