An analysis of live cattle option hedging strategies
Ted Schroeder,
Orlen C. Grunewald,
Scott A. Langemeier and
Del M. Allen
Additional contact information
Orlen C. Grunewald: Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Postal: Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University
Scott A. Langemeier: Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Postal: Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University
Del M. Allen: Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Postal: Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University
Agribusiness, 1989, vol. 5, issue 2, 153-168
Abstract:
Options on cattle futures have expanded the realm of alternative marketing strategies available to cattle feeders. This study utilized actual feedlot data to compare the return distributions from 31 separate fed cattle marketing strategies using cash, futures, put option, and call option markets. The results indicate that different strategies are preferred depending upon the risk preferences of the cattle feeder and the length of the feeding period. In general, over the 1980 through 1985 period, cash, hedging, and in-the-money put option purchases dominated spread and fence strategies for risk averse agents.
Date: 1989
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:agribz:v:5:y:1989:i:2:p:153-168
DOI: 10.1002/1520-6297(198903)5:2<153::AID-AGR2720050207>3.0.CO;2-Q
Access Statistics for this article
Agribusiness is currently edited by Ronald W. Cotterill
More articles in Agribusiness from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().