An Economic evaluation of horticultural alfalfa as a substitute for sphagnum peat moss
Ziyou Yu,
Jay Akridge,
Michael N. Dana and
Jess Lowenberg-DeBoer
Additional contact information
Ziyou Yu: Purdue University Department of Agricultural Economics, Postal: Purdue University Department of Agricultural Economics
Michael N. Dana: Purdue University Department of Horticulture, Postal: Purdue University Department of Horticulture
Jess Lowenberg-DeBoer: Purdue University Department of Agricultural Economics, Postal: Purdue University Department of Agricultural Economics
Agribusiness, 1990, vol. 6, issue 5, 443-462
Abstract:
Imported sphagnum peat holds a significant share of the US market for horticultural growing media, but the price of the product is relatively high due to transportation costs. Low-quality alfalfa may provide an effective substitute. The purpose of this research is to identify the characteristics consumers want in a horticultural organic material, to determine the cost competitiveness of an alfalfa-based substitute, and to determine the product's market potential. Results suggest that most consumers would accept alfalfa as a substitute. Production cost estimates range from $111.10 to $162.71 per short ton, depending on the quality of the raw material used. Due to lower transportation costs, the wholesale and retail prices of this new product are estimated to be about 30% lower than sphagnum peat.
Date: 1990
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:agribz:v:6:y:1990:i:5:p:443-462
DOI: 10.1002/1520-6297(199009)6:5<443::AID-AGR2720060504>3.0.CO;2-J
Access Statistics for this article
Agribusiness is currently edited by Ronald W. Cotterill
More articles in Agribusiness from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().