Does Familiarity Breed Contempt? The Impact of Information on Mass Attitudes toward Congress

Jeffery J. Mondak, Edward G. Carmines, Robert Huckfeldt, Dona‐Gene Mitchell and Scot Schraufnagel

American Journal of Political Science, 2007, vol. 51, issue 1, 34-48

Abstract: Two features of citizen response to Congress can be taken as grounds for concern. First, Americans know relatively little about Congress, and especially about congressional procedures and policy output. Second, Congress typically emerges as the least respected political institution. Although these matters are troubling when viewed individually, more disturbing is the dilemma posed when knowledge and attitudes toward Congress are viewed in tandem. It appears that citizens who know Congress the best like Congress the least. Consequently, a sophisticated polity and a well‐respected legislature seem fundamentally incompatible. This article seeks to resolve this dilemma, contending that there is nothing about knowledge per se that leads citizens to view Congress unfavorably. Rather, differences in knowledge levels alter the considerations citizens bring to bear when evaluating Congress, with the best‐informed individuals constructing judgments on the basis of the most relevant Congress‐specific criteria while less knowledgeable citizens employ readily available but more peripheral criteria.

Date: 2007
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00235.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:amposc:v:51:y:2007:i:1:p:34-48

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in American Journal of Political Science from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().