EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Vote Buying and Social Desirability Bias: Experimental Evidence from Nicaragua

Ezequiel Gonzalez‐Ocantos, Chad Kiewiet de Jonge, Carlos Meléndez, Javier Osorio and David W. Nickerson

American Journal of Political Science, 2012, vol. 56, issue 1, 202-217

Abstract: Qualitative studies of vote buying find the practice to be common in many Latin American countries, but quantitative studies using surveys find little evidence of vote buying. Social desirability bias can account for this discrepancy. We employ a survey‐based list experiment to minimize the problem. After the 2008 Nicaraguan municipal elections, we asked about vote‐buying behavior by campaigns using a list experiment and the questions traditionally used by studies of vote buying on a nationally representative survey. Our list experiment estimated that 24% of registered voters in Nicaragua were offered a gift or service in exchange for votes, whereas only 2% reported the behavior when asked directly. This detected social desirability bias is nonrandom and analysis based on traditional obtrusive measures of vote buying is unreliable. We also provide systematic evidence that shows the importance of monitoring strategies by parties in determining who is targeted for vote buying.

Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (41)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00540.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:amposc:v:56:y:2012:i:1:p:202-217

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in American Journal of Political Science from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:wly:amposc:v:56:y:2012:i:1:p:202-217