Credence Goods, Costly Diagnosis and Subjective Evaluation

Helmut Bester and Matthias Dahm

Economic Journal, 2018, vol. 128, issue 611, 1367-1394

Abstract: We study contracting between a consumer and an expert in a credence goods model when: (i) the expert's choice of diagnosis effort is not observable; (ii) the expert might misrepresent his private information about the adequate treatment; and (iii) payments can depend only on the consumer's subjective evaluation of treatment success. We show that the first†best solution can always be implemented if the parties’ discount factor is equal to one; a decrease in the discount factor makes obtaining the first†best more difficult. The first†best is also always implementable if separation of diagnosis and treatment is possible.

Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (25)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12472

Related works:
Working Paper: Credence Goods, Costly Diagnosis, and Subjective Evaluation (2014)
Working Paper: Credence Goods, Costly Diagnosis, and Subjective Evaluation (2014)
Working Paper: Credence Goods, Costly Diagnosis, and Subjective Evaluation (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:econjl:v:128:y:2018:i:611:p:1367-1394

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://onlinelibrary ... 1111/(ISSN)1468-0297

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Journal is currently edited by Estelle Cantillon, Martin Cripps, Andrea Galeotti, Morten Ravn, Kjell G. Salvanes, Frederic Vermeulen, Hans-Joachim Voth and Rachel Kranton

More articles in Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().