Comparing Conventional and Machine‐Learning Approaches to Risk Assessment in Domestic Abuse Cases

Jeffrey Grogger, Sean Gupta, Ria Ivandic and Tom Kirchmaier ()

Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2021, vol. 18, issue 1, 90-130

Abstract: We compare predictions from a conventional protocol‐based approach to risk assessment with those based on a machine‐learning approach. We first show that the conventional predictions are less accurate than, and have similar rates of negative prediction error as, a simple Bayes classifier that makes use of only the base failure rate. Machine‐learning algorithms based on the underlying risk assessment questionnaire do better under the assumption that negative prediction errors are more costly than positive prediction errors. Machine‐learning models based on two‐year criminal histories do even better. Indeed, adding the protocol‐based features to the criminal histories adds little to the predictive adequacy of the model. We suggest using the predictions based on criminal histories to prioritize incoming calls for service, and devising a more sensitive instrument to distinguish true from false positives that result from this initial screening.

Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12276

Related works:
Working Paper: Comparing Conventional and Machine-Learning Approaches to Risk Assessment in Domestic Abuse Cases (2021)
Working Paper: Comparing conventional and machine-learning approaches to risk assessment in domestic abuse cases (2020)
Working Paper: Comparing conventional and machine-learning approaches to risk assessment in domestic abuse cases (2020)
Working Paper: Comparing Conventional and Machine-Learning Approaches to Risk Assessment in Domestic Abuse Cases (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:empleg:v:18:y:2021:i:1:p:90-130

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Empirical Legal Studies from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().