Comparing conventional and machine-learning approaches to risk assessment in domestic abuse cases
Jeffrey Grogger,
Ria Ivandic and
Tom Kirchmaier ()
CEP Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Performance, LSE
Abstract:
We compare predictions from a conventional protocol-based approach to risk assessment with those based on a machine-learning approach. We first show that the conventional predictions are less accurate than, and have similar rates of negative prediction error as, a simple Bayes classifier that makes use only of the base failure rate. A random forest based on the underlying risk assessment questionnaire does better under the assumption that negative prediction errors are more costly than positive prediction errors. A random forest based on two-year criminal histories does better still. Indeed, adding the protocol-based features to the criminal histories adds almost nothing to the predictive adequacy of the model. We suggest using the predictions based on criminal histories to prioritize incoming calls for service, and devising a more sensitive instrument to distinguish true from false positives that result from this initial screening.
Keywords: domestic abuse; risk assessment; machine learning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K42 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020-02-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-big, nep-cmp and nep-law
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
https://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp1676.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Comparing Conventional and Machine‐Learning Approaches to Risk Assessment in Domestic Abuse Cases (2021) 
Working Paper: Comparing Conventional and Machine-Learning Approaches to Risk Assessment in Domestic Abuse Cases (2021) 
Working Paper: Comparing conventional and machine-learning approaches to risk assessment in domestic abuse cases (2020) 
Working Paper: Comparing Conventional and Machine-Learning Approaches to Risk Assessment in Domestic Abuse Cases (2020) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp1676
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CEP Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Performance, LSE
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().