Patient‐centered appraisal of race‐free clinical risk assessment

Charles Manski

Health Economics, 2022, vol. 31, issue 10, 2109-2114

Abstract: Until recently, there has been a consensus that clinicians seeking to assess patient risks of illness should condition risk assessments on all observed patient covariates with predictive power. The broad idea is that knowing more about patients enables more accurate predictions of their health risks and, hence, better clinical decisions. This consensus has recently unraveled with respect to a specific covariate, namely race. There have been increasing calls for race‐free risk assessment, arguing that using race to predict health risks contributes to racial disparities and inequities in health care. In some medical fields, leading institutions have recommended race‐free risk assessment. An important open question is how race‐free risk assessment would affect the quality of clinical decisions. Considering the matter from the patient‐centered perspective of medical economics yields a disturbing conclusion: Race‐free risk assessment would harm patients of all races.

Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4569

Related works:
Working Paper: Patient-Centered Appraisal of Race-Free Clinical Risk Assessment (2022)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:31:y:2022:i:10:p:2109-2114

Access Statistics for this article

Health Economics is currently edited by Alan Maynard, John Hutton and Andrew Jones

More articles in Health Economics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().