Estimating surgical volume—outcome relationships applying survival models: accounting for frailty and hospital fixed effects

Barton Hamilton () and Vivian H. Hamilton
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Vivian Ho

Health Economics, 1997, vol. 6, issue 4, 383-395

Abstract: This paper investigates the surgical volume–outcome relationship for patients undergoing hip fracture surgery in Quebec between 1991 and 1993. Using a duration model with multiple destinations which accounts for observed and unobserved (by the researcher) patient characteristics, our initial estimates show that higher surgical volume is associated with a higher conditional probability of live discharge from the hospital. However, these results reflect differences between hospitals rather than differences within hospitals over time: when we also control for differences between hospitals that are fixed over time, hospitals performing more surgeries in period t + 1 than in period t experience no significant change in outcomes, as would be predicted by the ‘practice makes perfect’ hypothesis. The volume–outcome relationship for hip fracture patients thus appears to reflect quality differences between high and low volume hospitals. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Date: 1997
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (31)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199707)6:43.0.CO;2-L

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:6:y:1997:i:4:p:383-395

Access Statistics for this article

Health Economics is currently edited by Alan Maynard, John Hutton and Andrew Jones

More articles in Health Economics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().