Controlling for the endogeneity of peer substance use on adolescent alcohol and tobacco use

Edward Norton, Richard Lindrooth and Susan T. Ennett

Health Economics, 1998, vol. 7, issue 5, 439-453

Abstract: This study examines whether the effects of peer substance use on adolescent alcohol and tobacco use are due to endogeneity of adolescents selecting their peer group. We analyzed data collected for a longitudinal analysis of a drug‐use prevention programme for upper elementary school students. We used a two‐step probit regression to control for the potentially endogenous explanatory variable peer substance use. Rigorous tests of endogeneity and the validity of the instrumental variables showed that controlling for the endogeneity of peer substance use to reduce bias is not worth the reduction in mean squared error in these data. Peer substance use has a positive and significant effect on adolescent substance use for both drinking and smoking. These results imply that peer influence is empirically more important than peer selection (endogeneity) in our sample of adolescents in grades 6–9. Living in a single‐parent family was by far the strongest predictor of adolescent drinking and smoking. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Date: 1998
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (81)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199808)7:53.0.CO;2-9

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:7:y:1998:i:5:p:439-453

Access Statistics for this article

Health Economics is currently edited by Alan Maynard, John Hutton and Andrew Jones

More articles in Health Economics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().