Measuring Financial Integration via Idiosyncratic Risk: What Effects Are We Really Picking Up?

David Parsley and Christian Schlag

Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2007, vol. 39, issue 5, 1267-1273

Abstract: We study the method proposed by Flood and Rose (FR, 2004, 2005) for checking for financial integration by estimating the risk‐free rate using the idiosyncratic component of individual stock returns. Performing simulations with data with a known return generation process, we find that the FR methodology produces poor estimates of the risk‐free rate, and hence the FR method fails to accept integration when true. We then show analytically that the FR method actually provides an estimate of the market return, and conclude the FR methodology would also falsely accept integration as long as the market returns in the two markets do not differ widely.

Date: 2007
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2007.00065.x

Related works:
Journal Article: Measuring Financial Integration via Idiosyncratic Risk: What Effects Are We Really Picking Up? (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jmoncb:v:39:y:2007:i:5:p:1267-1273

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Money, Credit and Banking is currently edited by Robert deYoung, Paul Evans, Pok-Sang Lam and Kenneth D. West

More articles in Journal of Money, Credit and Banking from Blackwell Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().