Valuation risk revalued

Oliver de Groot, Alexander Richter and Nathaniel Throckmorton

Quantitative Economics, 2022, vol. 13, issue 2, 723-759

Abstract: This paper shows the success of valuation risk—time‐preference shocks in Epstein–Zin utility—in resolving asset pricing puzzles rests sensitively on the way it is introduced. The specification used in the literature is at odds with several desirable properties of recursive preferences because the weights in the time‐aggregator do not sum to one. When we revise the specification in a simple asset pricing model the puzzles resurface. However, when estimating a sequence of increasingly rich models, we find valuation risk under the revised specification consistently improves the ability of the models to match asset price and cash‐flow dynamics.

Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.3982/QE1779

Related works:
Working Paper: Valuation Risk Revalued (2020)
Working Paper: Valuation Risk Revalued (2019)
Working Paper: Valuation Risk Revalued (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:quante:v:13:y:2022:i:2:p:723-759

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.econometricsociety.org/membership

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Quantitative Economics from Econometric Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().