Economic consequences of vertical mismatch

Pietro Garibaldi, Pedro Gomes and Thepthida Sopraseuth

Quantitative Economics, 2025, vol. 16, issue 2, 535-564

Abstract: We study two first‐order economic consequences of vertical mismatch, using a simple (neoclassical) model of under and overemployment. Individuals of high type can perform both skilled and unskilled jobs, but only a fraction of low‐type workers can perform skilled jobs. People have different costs over these jobs. First, we calibrate the model to match U.S. CPS time series since the 1980s. To control for unobserved heterogeneity, we compute wages based on workers who have switched between skilled and unskilled jobs. We show that changes in educational mismatch has contributed one‐sixth as much as skilled‐bias technological progress for the rise in the college premium. Second, we calibrate the model to match moments of the 50 United States, to measure the output costs of frictions generating mismatch. The cost of frictions is 0.26% of output on average but varies between 0.06% to 0.77% across states. The key variable that explains the output cost of vertical mismatch is not the percentage of mismatched workers but their wage relative to well‐matched workers.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.3982/QE1868

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:quante:v:16:y:2025:i:2:p:535-564

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.econometricsociety.org/membership

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Quantitative Economics from Econometric Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().