Do households use home‐ownership to insure themselves? Evidence across U.S. cities
Michael Amior and
Quantitative Economics, 2014, vol. 5, issue 3, 631-674
Are households more likely to be homeowners when “housing risk” is higher? We show that home‐ownership rates and loan‐to‐value (LTV) ratios at the city level are strongly negatively correlated with local house price volatility. However, causal inference is confounded by house price levels, which are systematically correlated with housing risk in an intuitive way: in cities where the land value is larger relative to the local cost of structures, house prices are higher and more volatile. We disentangle the contributions of high price levels from high volatilities by building a life‐cycle model of home‐ownership choices. We find that higher price levels can explain most of the lower home‐ownership. Higher risk in the model leads to slightly lower home‐ownership and LTV ratios in high land value cities. The relationship between LTV and risk is corroborated by LTV's negative correlation with price volatility in the data and highlights the importance of including other means of incomplete insurance in models of home‐ownership.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (25) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Do households use home-ownership to insure themselves? Evidence across U.S. cities (2014)
Working Paper: Do Households Use Homeownership To Insure Themselves? Evidence across US Cities (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:quante:v:5:y:2014:i:3:p:631-674
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Quantitative Economics from Econometric Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().