Estimating ambiguity aversion in a portfolio choice experiment

David Ahn, Syngjoo Choi, Douglas Gale () and Shachar Kariv

Quantitative Economics, 2014, vol. 5, 195-223

Abstract: We report a portfolio‐choice experiment that enables us to estimate parametric models of ambiguity aversion at the level of the individual subject. The assets are Arrow securities that correspond to three states of nature, where one state is risky with known probability and two states are ambiguous with unknown probabilities. We estimate two specifications of ambiguity aversion, one kinked and one smooth, that encompass many of the theoretical models in the literature. Each specification includes two parameters: one for ambiguity attitudes and another for risk attitudes. We also estimate a three‐parameter specification that includes an additional parameter for pessimism/optimism (underweighting/overweighting the probabilities of different payoffs). The parameter estimates for individual subjects exhibit considerable heterogeneity. We cannot reject the null hypothesis of subjective expected utility for a majority of subjects. Most of the remaining subjects exhibit statistically significant ambiguity aversion or seeking and/or pessimism or optimism.

Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (149)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/quan.2014.5.issue-2.x

Related works:
Working Paper: Estimating Ambiguity Aversion in a Portfolio Choice Experiment (2013)
Working Paper: Estimating Ambiguity Aversion in a Portfolio Choice Experiment (2009)
Working Paper: Estimating Ambiguity Aversion in a Portfolio Choice Experiment (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:quante:v:5:y:2014:i::p:195-223

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.econometricsociety.org/membership

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Quantitative Economics from Econometric Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().