Testing ambiguity theories with a mean‐preserving design

Chun‐Lei Yang and Lan Yao

Quantitative Economics, 2017, vol. 8, issue 1, 219-238

Abstract: Prominent models such as maxmin expected utility/alpha‐multiprior (MEU/ α‐MP) and Klibanoff, Marinacci, and Mukerji (KMM) interpret ambiguity aversion as aversion against second‐order risks associated with ambiguous acts. We design an experiment where the decision maker draws twice with replacement in the typical Ellsberg two‐color urns, but with a different color winning each time. Given this set of mean‐preserving prospects, MEU/α‐MP, KMM, and Savage's subjective expected utility all predict unequivocally that risk‐averse decision makers (DMs) will avoid the 50–50 urn that exhibits the highest risk conceivable, while risk‐seeking DMs do the opposite. However, we observe a substantial number of violations in the experiments. It appears that the ambiguity premium is partially paid to avoid the ambiguity issue per se, which is distinct from notions of second‐order risk. This finding is robust even when there is only partial ambiguity, and is applicable to all models that satisfy a monotonicity condition.

Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:quante:v:8:y:2017:i:1:p:219-238

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.econometricsociety.org/membership

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Quantitative Economics from Econometric Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().