When does regression discontinuity design work? Evidence from random election outcomes

Ari Hyytinen, Jaakko Meriläinen (), Tuukka Saarimaa, Otto Toivanen and Janne Tukiainen

Quantitative Economics, 2018, vol. 9, issue 2, 1019-1051

Abstract: We use elections data in which a large number of ties in vote counts between candidates are resolved via a lottery to study the personal incumbency advantage. We benchmark non‐experimental regression discontinuity design (RDD) estimates against the estimate produced by this experiment that takes place exactly at the cutoff. The experimental estimate suggests that there is no personal incumbency advantage. In contrast, conventional local polynomial RDD estimates suggest a moderate and statistically significant effect. Bias‐corrected RDD estimates that apply robust inference are, however, in line with the experimental estimate. Therefore, state‐of‐the‐art implementation of RDD can meet the replication standard in the context of close elections.

Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (43)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.3982/QE864

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:quante:v:9:y:2018:i:2:p:1019-1051

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.econometricsociety.org/membership

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Quantitative Economics from Econometric Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().