Bias in Population Estimates of Long‐Term Exposure from Short‐Term Measurements of Individual Exposure

Robert J. Buck, Karen A. Hammerstrom and P. Barry Ryan

Risk Analysis, 1997, vol. 17, issue 4, 455-466

Abstract: A population's long‐term exposure distribution for a specified compound is typically estimated from short‐term measurements of a sample of individuals from the population of interest. In this situation, estimates of a population's long‐term exposure parameters contain two sources of sampling error: the typical sampling error associated with taking a sample from the population and the sampling error from estimating individual long‐term exposure. These components are not separable in the data collected, i.e., the value observed is due partly to the individual sampled and partly to the time at which the individual was sampled. Hence, the distribution of the data collected is not the same as the population exposure distribution. Monte Carlo simulations are used to compare the distribution of the observed data with the population exposure distribution for a simple additive model. A simple adjustment to standard estimates of percentiles and quantils is shown to be effective in reducing bias particularly for the upper percentiles and quantils of the population distribution.

Date: 1997
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00886.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:riskan:v:17:y:1997:i:4:p:455-466

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Risk Analysis from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().