The True Cost of Precautionary Chemicals Regulation

Bill Durodié

Risk Analysis, 2003, vol. 23, issue 2, 389-398

Abstract: This article explores the possible social costs of introducing an overly precautionary regulatory regime for chemicals. It begins by examining research by the UK Medical Research Council Institute for Environment and Health (MRC‐IEH), which suggests that the resource implications of the proposals contained in the European Commission White Paper “Strategy for a Future Chemicals Policy”(1) are unrealistic and even unrealizable. The article then focuses on contemporary debates pertaining to endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and goes on to question whether a “right to know” is always necessarily a good thing, or whether in certain instances it can lead to a society that feels more sorry than safe.(2) Finally, problems relating to the representation and inclusion of public values in decision‐making processes are raised prior to concluding with a call for an ambitious orientation toward social change rather than a self‐limiting obsession with safety.

Date: 2003
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1539-6924.00318

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:riskan:v:23:y:2003:i:2:p:389-398

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Risk Analysis from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().