Using Risk Assessment, Benefit‐Cost Analysis, and Real Options to Implement a Precautionary Principle

Robert Farrow

Risk Analysis, 2004, vol. 24, issue 3, 727-735

Abstract: Risk assessment is an established methodology for environmental and public health issues. However, economists' core approach to both risk assessment and risk management, benefit‐cost analysis, often fails to transparently evaluate variability in a way that is a trademark of quantitative risk assessment. Concurrently, environmental advocates are proposing new management criteria based on a vaguely framed “Precautionary Principle.” This manuscript demonstrates how risk assessment techniques for characterizing variability, benefit‐cost analysis, and decision‐making criteria under uncertainty and irreversibility can be combined. The result is a quantifiable, case‐specific, and risk‐dependent “precautionary” threshold for action compared to standard benefit‐cost approaches. The Clean Air Act and the regulation of genetically modified corn provide applications.

Date: 2004
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00471.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:riskan:v:24:y:2004:i:3:p:727-735

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Risk Analysis from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().