Improving Risk‐Based Decision Making for Terrorism Applications

Louis Anthony Cox, Jr

Risk Analysis, 2009, vol. 29, issue 3, 336-341

Abstract: How can we best allocate limited defensive resources to reduce terrorism risks? Dillon et al.'s Antiterrorism Risk‐Based Decision Aid (ARDA) system provides a useful point of departure for addressing this crucial question by exhibiting a real‐world system that calculates risk reduction scores for different portfolios of risk‐reducing countermeasures and using them to rank‐order different possible risk mitigation alternatives for Navy facilities. This comment points out some potential limitations of any scoring system that does not take into account risk externalities, interdependencies among threats, uncertainties that are correlated across targets, and attacker responses to alternative allocations of defensive resources. In at least some simple situations, allocations based on risk reduction scores and comparisons can inadvertently increase risks by providing intelligent attackers with valuable information, or they can fail to reduce risks as effectively as nonscoring, optimization‐based approaches. These limitations of present scoring methods present exciting technical challenges and opportunities for risk analysts to develop improved methods for protecting facilities and infrastructure against terrorist threats.

Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01206.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:riskan:v:29:y:2009:i:3:p:336-341

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Risk Analysis from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().