Living with Nuclear Power: A Q‐Method Study of Local Community Perceptions

Dan Venables, Nick Pidgeon, Peter Simmons, Karen Henwood and Karen Parkhill

Risk Analysis, 2009, vol. 29, issue 8, 1089-1104

Abstract: The issue of new nuclear power is once again high up on the public policy agenda in many countries, and candidate sites for new civilian stations are likely to include those that have existing nuclear facilities. A common assumption is that existing nuclear communities will be more accepting of new build because of the direct economic and other benefits nuclear power already makes to a local area. Surprisingly, there is a dearth of contemporary data on perceptions of the risks, benefits, and values associated with nuclear power within such communities. This study uses Q‐methodology to investigate the perspectives on living with nuclear risk among people (n = 84) drawn from communities near to two nuclear power stations in the United Kingdom. Both stations, at Bradwell‐on‐Sea and Oldbury‐on‐Severn, had been in operation for over 40 years. The Q‐analysis identified four main perspectives, or points of view, accounting for 53% of total variance. These were interpreted as: Beneficial and Safe; Threat and Distrust; Reluctant Acceptance; and There's No Point Worrying. We conclude that the “landscape of beliefs” about nuclear power in such communities is both subtle and complex, avoiding simplistic bipolar dichotomies such as “for” or “against,” and that there is a need for extensive and meaningful dialogue with such communities over any new build plans. The usefulness of Q‐methodology for investigating the ways in which people live with risk is highlighted, as are the implications of the results for theories of risk and trust.

Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01259.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:riskan:v:29:y:2009:i:8:p:1089-1104

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Risk Analysis from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().