EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Quantifying Human Health Risks from Virginiamycin Use in Food Animals in China

Louis Anthony Cox, Douglas A. Popken, Jian Sun, Xiao‐ping Liao and Liang‐Xing Fang

Risk Analysis, 2020, vol. 40, issue 6, 1244-1257

Abstract: Virginiamycin (VM), a streptogramin antibiotic, has been used to promote healthy growth and treat illnesses in farm animals in the United States and other countries. The combination streptogramin Quinupristin‐Dalfopristin (QD) was approved in the United States in 1999 for treating patients with vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) infections. Many chickens and swine test positive for QD‐resistant E. faecium, raising concerns that using VM in food animals might select for streptogramin‐resistant strains of E. faecium that could compromise QD effectiveness in treating human VREF infections. Such concerns have prompted bans and phase‐outs of VM as growth promoters in the United States and Europe. This study quantitatively estimates potential human health risks from QD‐resistant VREF infections due to VM use in food animals in China. Plausible conservative (risk‐maximizing) quantitative risk estimates are derived for future uses, assuming 100% resistance to linezolid and daptomycin and 100% prescription rate of QD to high‐level (VanA) VREF‐infected patients. Up to one shortened life every few decades to every few thousand years might occur in China from VM use in animals, although the most likely risk is zero (e.g., if resistance is not transferred from bacteria in food animals to bacteria infecting human patients). Sensitivity and probabilistic uncertainty analyses suggest that this conclusion is robust to several data gaps and uncertainties. Potential future human health risks from VM use in animals in China appear to be small or zero, even if QD is eventually approved for use in human patients.

Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13466

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:riskan:v:40:y:2020:i:6:p:1244-1257

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Risk Analysis from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:40:y:2020:i:6:p:1244-1257