On Criteria of Insignificant Difference Between Two Risks
Julius Goodman
Risk Analysis, 1986, vol. 6, issue 2, 235-244
Abstract:
The comparison and ranking of risks is very important for safety and cost‐benefit analysis. Most formats present risks in the form of probability distribution. Different ranking criteria for probability distributions are considered. It is demonstrated that significantly overlapping distributions lead to ambiguous results. For this reason, criteria of insignificant overlapping distributions are proposed. The first criterion uses the information theory approach; and the second criterion uses the statistical tests approach. Both approaches can be applied to decision theory to avoid questionable decisions based on statistically insignificant differences between two risks.
Date: 1986
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1986.tb00211.x
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:riskan:v:6:y:1986:i:2:p:235-244
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Risk Analysis from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().