The Return to Hours and Workers in U.S. Manufacturing: Evidence on Aggregation Bias

Ronald DeBeaumont and Larry D. Singell

Southern Economic Journal, 1999, vol. 66, issue 2, 336-352

Abstract: Reliance on overtime or part‐time work is contested by organized labor and suggests employers exploit trade‐offs between workers and hours. Worker‐hour models predict return to hours and workers' estimates are crucial in evaluating the trade‐off between them. This paper uses data that vary by industry to test and reject a common production structure across industries used in prior work; this aggregation is shown to yield an upward bias in return‐to‐hours estimates. Contrary to prior evidence, the industry‐specific return‐to‐hour estimates are lower than return‐to‐worker estimates and are generally less than one, suggesting that trade‐offs between workers and hours may be cost effective.

Date: 1999
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2325-8012.1999.tb00250.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:soecon:v:66:y:1999:i:2:p:336-352

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Southern Economic Journal from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().