Inequality, Nonhomothetic Preferences, and Trade: A Gravity Approach

Muhammed Dalgin, Vitor Trindade and Devashish Mitra ()

Southern Economic Journal, 2008, vol. 74, issue 3, 747-774

Abstract: We construct the first direct classification of goods as luxuries or necessities that is compatible with international trade data. We then use it to test an idea that has not been tested directly in the literature: Countries' income distributions are important determinants of their import demand, and, in particular, of the difference in their import demands of luxuries versus necessities. We interpret this result with the aid of a model in which preferences are nonhomothetic, thus relaxing a long‐held and standard—but empirically dubious—assumption in the theory of international trade. Our model is strongly borne out by the results: Imports of luxuries increase with the importing country's inequality, and imports of necessities decrease with it. Our calculations imply that if income distribution in the United States became as equal as in Canada, the United States would import about 9‐13% fewer luxury goods and 13‐19% more necessities.

Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2325-8012.2008.tb00862.x

Related works:
Working Paper: Inequality, Nonhomothetic Preferences, And Trade: A Gravity Approach (2006)
Working Paper: Inequality, Nonhomothetic Preferences, and Trade: A Gravity Approach (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:soecon:v:74:y:2008:i:3:p:747-774

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Southern Economic Journal from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().