EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Comparing Small‐Group and Individual Behavior in Lottery‐Choice Experiments

Ronald J. Baker, Susan K. Laury and Arlington Williams

Southern Economic Journal, 2008, vol. 75, issue 2, 367-382

Abstract: Lottery‐choice experiments are conducted to compare risk preferences revealed by three‐person groups versus isolated individuals. A lottery‐choice experiment consists of a menu of paired lottery choices structured so that the crossover point from a low‐risk to a high‐risk lottery can be used to infer the degree of risk aversion. The data from a between‐subjects experiment indicate that the difference in the average crossover point for groups versus individuals is not significant, but groups tend to make decisions that are more consistent with risk‐neutral preferences in the lowest and highest risk lotteries. The data from a three‐phase individual‐group‐individual sequenced experiment indicate that groups choose significantly more low‐risk lotteries than the mean choice of the individual group members. Also, making a phase 2 group decision influences the subsequent phase 3 individual decisions toward the group decision relative to the initial phase 1 (individual) decisions.

Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2325-8012.2008.tb00909.x

Related works:
Working Paper: Comparing Small-Group and Individual Behavior in Lottery-Choice Experiments (2008) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:soecon:v:75:y:2008:i:2:p:367-382

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Southern Economic Journal from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:75:y:2008:i:2:p:367-382