IMITATION THROUGH TECHNOLOGY LICENSING: STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS FOR SMALLER FIRMS

Julian Lowe () and Peter Taylor ()
Additional contact information
Julian Lowe: School of Business, University of Ballarat, PO Box 663, Ballarat, Victoria 3353, Australia
Peter Taylor: Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Frenchay, United Kingdom

International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), 1999, vol. 03, issue 02, 185-207

Abstract: An important aspect of strategic choice is whether to pioneer or to imitate, that is, whether to be a first-mover or a follower. It has been suggested that this is particularly important for small and medium-size enterprises (SMEs) because of potential disadvantages of scale in design, production and marketing. However, empirical evidence suggests that many SMEs can be successful first-movers and that pioneering strategies enable them to compete against larger firms that have scale advantages and possess important downstream resources. This paper looks at the issue of timing of entry from a different perspective. It is concerned with the role of imitation as a strategy and its success when smaller firms are in competition with larger firms. Acquisition of technology through licensing is a frequently used strategy for firms of all sizes. It is also a classic 'imitation' strategy. The paper reports a study of imitative behaviour in a sample of UK manufacturing firms of varying sizes. A comparison of strategic motives, capabilities and outcomes is examined in the context of technology strategies involving both in-house R&D and that acquired through inward technology licensing. An important distinction is made between licensing that provides a basis for subsequent innovation and licensing for reactive imitative purposes. The study concludes that imitation is a viable policy option for smaller firms, but that complementary assets and appropriate capabilities determine whether such a policy has a major competitive impact or is merely a reaction to unsuccessful in-house innovation. The study calls into question the use of size per se as a competitive indicator, and indicates reasons underpinning imitative behaviour that may influence downstream success.

Keywords: SMEs; imitation; technology licensing; strategy; first-mover advantage (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1999
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1363919699000098
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:03:y:1999:i:02:n:s1363919699000098

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S1363919699000098

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim) is currently edited by Joe Tidd

More articles in International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().