AN EXAMINATION OF CLUSTER AND NON-CLUSTER FIRMS’ KNOWLEDGE-BASED ACTIVITIES
Dorothy M. Kirkman,
Shalei V. K. Simms () and
Dt Ogilvie ()
Additional contact information
Dorothy M. Kirkman: University of Houston–Clear Lake, 2700 Bay Area Blvd., Houston, TX 77546, USA
Shalei V. K. Simms: SUNY College at Old Westbury, P. O. Box 210, Westbury, NY 11568, USA
Dt Ogilvie: Saunders College of Business, Rochester Institute of Technology, 107 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, New York 14623, USA
International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), 2016, vol. 20, issue 08, 1-17
Abstract:
This study puts forth the following research questions: (i) Are there any differences between remotes’ and co-locates’ knowledge portfolios, and (ii) if so, are these differences significant? We contend that significant differences occur in how remotes configure their knowledge activities. To search for possible differences, we examined three sources of knowledge-based activities that are associated with remotes and co-locates: university collaborations and innovative activities such as patenting and scanning. Using survey data from a study of 197 U.S. biotechnology firms, this study found that remotes and co-locates have similar portfolio diversity, but remotes sponsor more faculty research, have a lower patent efficiency rate, and do not scan as frequently as co-located firms.
Keywords: Agglomerations; biotechnology firms; knowledge creation; innovation; knowledge diversity; knowledge ecosystems; patents; requisite variety; scanning; university collaborations; clusters (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S136391961640017X
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:20:y:2016:i:08:n:s136391961640017x
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
DOI: 10.1142/S136391961640017X
Access Statistics for this article
International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim) is currently edited by Joe Tidd
More articles in International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().