EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

INCUMBENT’S CURSE REVISITED: ARE FIRM STEREOTYPES BENEFICIAL OR HARMFUL FOR ESTABLISHED COMPANIES PURSUING RADICAL TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS?

Nicholas Folger, Tim Kanis (), Jutta Stumpf-Wollersheim () and Isabell M. Welpe ()
Additional contact information
Nicholas Folger: Chair for Strategy and Organisation, TUM School of Management, Technical University of Munich, Aricsstrasse 21, Munich D-80333, Germany
Tim Kanis: Chair for International Management and Corporate Strategy, Faculty of Business Administration, Technical University Bergakademie Freiberg, Schlossplatz 1, Freiberg D-09599, Germany
Jutta Stumpf-Wollersheim: Chair for International Management and Corporate Strategy, Faculty of Business Administration, Technical University Bergakademie Freiberg, Schlossplatz 1, Freiberg D-09599, Germany
Isabell M. Welpe: Chair for Strategy and Organisation, TUM School of Management, Technical University of Munich, Aricsstrasse 21, Munich D-80333, Germany

International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), 2022, vol. 26, issue 04, 1-39

Abstract: Established companies often struggle while start-ups gain market share by pursuing radical technological innovations. Research has found that internal organisational barriers can cause this incumbent’s curse, but it has not explored the role of external actors. Drawing on social judgements of organisations theory, we suggest that potential consumers possess firm stereotypes (i.e., warmth and competence perceptions), which affect their expectations about the success of established companies and start-ups in pursuing radical technological innovations. Findings from three experimental studies show that established companies are perceived as more competent but less warm than start-ups. This perception leads to higher success expectations for established companies pursuing radical technological innovations. Yet, these benefits are no longer present after the revelation of information about a fatal error.

Keywords: Radical technological innovations; firm stereotypes; social judgements of organisations theory; established companies; start-ups (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1363919622500232
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:26:y:2022:i:04:n:s1363919622500232

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S1363919622500232

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim) is currently edited by Joe Tidd

More articles in International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:26:y:2022:i:04:n:s1363919622500232