EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

BETTER LATE THAN NEVER! INVESTIGATING DETERMINANTS OF AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN TEMPORARY AND CONTINUOUS INNOVATION REJECTIONS

Sven Heidenreich, Jan A. Millemann and Slawka Jordanow
Additional contact information
Sven Heidenreich: ,‡Faculty of Human and Business Sciences, Chair of Technology and Innovation Management, Saarland University, 66041 Saarbrücken, Germany
Jan A. Millemann: ��Department of Industrial Engineering & Innovation Sciences, Innovation Technology Entrepreneurship & Marketing, Eindhoven University of Technology Building 3, Atlas 6, De Groene Loper, P.O. Box Eindhoven, MB 513 5600, The Netherlands
Slawka Jordanow: ,‡Faculty of Human and Business Sciences, Chair of Technology and Innovation Management, Saarland University, 66041 Saarbrücken, Germany

International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), 2022, vol. 26, issue 04, 1-43

Abstract: Little research effort has been dedicated to investigate the nature and determinants of and the differences between temporary and continuous consumer rejections of innovations. To shed light on both types of consumer rejection behaviours and their underlying psychological processes, this paper applies a mixed-method approach. First, we conducted a qualitative study to investigate whether known determinants comprehensively cover reasons for both types of consumer rejections. Based on the qualitative study’s evidence, we introduce a new type of innovation resistance (transactional innovation resistance) to complement the well-known concepts of active and passive innovation resistance as drivers of rejection behaviour. Second, we validated the derived framework using a large-scale quantitative study to empirically determine each determinant’s relative importance for temporary and continuous consumer rejection of innovations. Our results demonstrate that consumers who continuously reject an innovation are primarily driven by a combinatory effect of passive and active innovation resistance. In contrast, consumers who only temporarily reject are largely motivated by a combinatory effect of transactional and active innovation resistance.

Keywords: Adoption behaviour; innovation diffusion; innovation resistance; continuous rejection; temporary rejection; postponement (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1363919622500347
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:26:y:2022:i:04:n:s1363919622500347

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S1363919622500347

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim) is currently edited by Joe Tidd

More articles in International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:26:y:2022:i:04:n:s1363919622500347