Magnitude and Distribution of Electricity and Water Subsidies for Households with Private Connections in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Helena Cardenas and Dale Whittington
Additional contact information
Helena Cardenas: Department of City and Regional Planning, College of Arts and Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, New East Building, CB #3140, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
Dale Whittington: Department of City and Regional Planning, College of Arts and Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, New East Building, CB #3140, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA2Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA3Global Development Institute, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK

Water Economics and Policy (WEP), 2021, vol. 07, issue 01, 1-44

Abstract: This paper presents the first detailed analysis of the combined effects of increasing block tariff (IBT) structures for both electricity and water in an urban area of a developing country. In Addis Ababa, an IBT has been used to calculate households’ monthly bills for electricity and water services. This study estimates the magnitude of combined water and electricity subsidies received by households with private connections to both the electricity grid and the piped network water in 2016, and it evaluates the distribution of these subsidies among wealth groups. Customer billing data supplied by utility companies are matched with socioeconomic information collected through a household survey. Results show that the combined subsidies are large. The average household receives a subsidy of USD 26 per month, about 6% of household income. The findings also show that both electricity and water subsidies under the IBT disproportionately accrue to richer households. The poorest quintile receives 12% of the total subsidies for electricity and water services, while the richest quintile receives 31%. The IBT used in the water sector performed worse in terms of targeting of subsidies to poor households than the IBT used in the electricity sector.

Keywords: Electricity residential consumption; increasing block tariff; subsidy leakage; subsidy incidence; water residential consumption; Addis Ababa; Ethiopia (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S2382624X21500041
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:wepxxx:v:07:y:2021:i:01:n:s2382624x21500041

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S2382624X21500041

Access Statistics for this article

Water Economics and Policy (WEP) is currently edited by Ariel Dinar

More articles in Water Economics and Policy (WEP) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().