Accounting for Residential Nonpayment Risk for Water Utility Financial Sustainability

Erika Smull and Martin Doyle
Additional contact information
Erika Smull: Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, 9 Circuit Drive, Durham, NC 27710, USA†Municipal Research Analyst, Breckinridge Capital Advisors, 125 High Street, Boston, MA 02110, USA
Martin Doyle: Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, 9 Circuit Drive, Durham, NC 27710, USA‡Water Policy Program, Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions, Duke University, 2117 Campus Drive, Durham, NC 27708, USA

Water Economics and Policy (WEP), 2023, vol. 09, issue 02, 1-18

Abstract: Residential “Nonpayment risk†for water utilities — the risk of revenue loss from residential customers not paying water bills — is a financial risk for water service providers that remains poorly understood. Current rate setting strategies do not explicitly consider nonpayment risk and are generally informed by past payment histories. We develop a new heuristic model to categorize and evaluate water utility pricing (rate setting) strategies that are responsive to the effects of nonpayment (i.e., delinquency) on water utility revenues. The model is the first attempt, to our knowledge, to theorize the impact of residential nonpayment on utility revenues. The method draws on the theory behind the Kelly Criterion, a strategy developed in the mid-20th century now used by investors in portfolio management. The results of our thought exercise show that even excessive nonpayment levels (50% each year) do not negate the effectiveness of rate increases for revenue generation, but that nonpayment management can provide revenue benefits. Without political motives, utilities with high nonpayment may be inclined to continue raising water rates, unless higher water rates result in higher nonpayment levels. As such, we highlight the need to understand “nonpayment elasticity†: the change in nonpayment due to changes in water rates. We illustrate how increased nonpayment elasticity can decrease the percent of potential revenue collected, particularly when water rates are increased substantially. The simple model provides a method to evaluate the financial sustainability of elevated nonpayment rates in water utility management and financial risk analysis.

Keywords: Water utilities; financial risk; utility finance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S2382624X23500030
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:wepxxx:v:09:y:2023:i:02:n:s2382624x23500030

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S2382624X23500030

Access Statistics for this article

Water Economics and Policy (WEP) is currently edited by Ariel Dinar

More articles in Water Economics and Policy (WEP) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().