Revisiting the Invisible Hand Hypothesis: A Comparative Study between Bulgaria and Germany
Aleksandar Vasilev and
EconStor Open Access Articles, 2017
This paper examines Adam Smith’s concept of an Invisible Hand of the market in light of the underlying assumptions for the theory to hold. Furthermore, the study focuses on Total Factor Productivity as a measure of efficiency of resource allocation, employs growth accounting in Bulgaria relative to a frontier country (Germany), and tries to explain the Total Factor Productivity gap with the difference in the quality of institutions and economic freedom performance (where the latter is based on the Freedom Index Indicators). Satisfactory results have been obtained, favoring the hypothesis that freer markets perform better and a “catching up” effect of Bulgaria’s Total Factor Productivity levels towards those of Germany has been observed. Finally, the study provides policy recommendations facilitating the Invisible Hand Process in Bulgaria for a more rapid convergence towards Germany’s productivity levels.
Keywords: invisible hand; total factor productivity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Revisiting the ‘invisible hand’ hypothesis: a comparative study between Bulgaria and Germany (2017)
Working Paper: Revisiting the Invisible Hand Hypothesis: A Comparative Study between Bulgaria and Germany (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:espost:161620
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in EconStor Open Access Articles from ZBW - German National Library of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by ZBW - German National Library of Economics ().