Same, but different? Testing monetary policy shock measures

Stephanie Ettmeier and Alexander Kriwoluzky

EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, 2019, vol. 184

Abstract: In this study, we determine the reliability and exogeneity of four popular monetary policy shock measures, namely the narrative series of Romer and Romer (2004), the high-frequency series of Barakchian and Crowe (2013), the high-frequency series of Gertler and Karadi (2015), and the hybrid series of Miranda-Agrippino and Ricco (2018b). To this end, we employ the Proxy-SVAR model and different empirical diagnostic tools to determine the shock measures’ information content. We find that the measure of Miranda-Agrippino and Ricco (2018b), combining the insights from the narrative approach and high-frequency identification, outperforms the other three series.

Keywords: Identification with external instruments; Monetary policy shock measures; Proxy-SVAR (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C12 C32 E32 E52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/237663/1/2 ... e%20Different_AV.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Same, but different? Testing monetary policy shock measures (2019)
Working Paper: Same, but different: Testing monetary policy shock measures (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:espost:237663

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters from ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().