Motivated political reasoning: On the emergence of belief-value constellations

Kai Barron, Anna Becker and Steffen Huck

EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, 2025, vol. 172, No 104929

Abstract: We study the relationship between moral values (‘‘ought’’ statements) and factual beliefs (‘‘is’’ statements). We show that thinking about values affects the beliefs people hold. This effect is mediated by prior political leanings, thereby contributing to the polarization of factual beliefs. We document these findings in a pre-registered online experiment with a nationally representative sample of over 1,800 individuals in the US. We also show that participants do not distort their beliefs in response to financial incentives to do so, suggesting that deep values exert a stronger motivational force than financial incentives.

Keywords: Motivated beliefs; Values; Polarization; Experiment; Reasoning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C90 D72 D74 D83 P16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/320721/1/F ... ated%20political.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:espost:320721

DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2024.104929

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters from ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().