Stakeholder theory: A radical institutionalist view

Vladislav Valentinov

EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, 2025, vol. 59, issue 4, 1015 pages

Abstract: Stakeholder theory is sometimes criticized by radical scholars for being pro-business and pro-capitalistic. However, stakeholder theorists recognize their disagreements with neoclassical economics and reject the notion of shareholder primacy. I argue that the rejection of shareholder primacy introduces a radical dimension to stakeholder theory, which can be further developed by drawing on the radical institutionalist literature. This literature acknowledges that private ownership can impede the social provisioning process by acting as a ceremonial drag. By adopting a radical institutionalist view of stakeholder theory, I suggest that rejecting shareholder primacy implies eliminating ceremonial elements that hinder the social provisioning process. Consequently, I see stakeholder management as a possible means of replacing these elements with discretionary community control that promotes inclusion, empowerment, and engagement of diverse stakeholders.

Keywords: radical institutionalism; shareholder primacy; stakeholder management; stakeholder theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B52 D21 G30 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/336453/1/V ... akeholder_theory.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:espost:336453

DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2025.2575145

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters from ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().