Fighting in-work poverty: the minimum wage versus in-work benefits

Richard V. Burkhauser, Kevin Corinth and Joseph J. Sabia

Chapter 17 in Handbook on Labour Markets in Transition, 2024, pp 319-337 from Edward Elgar Publishing

Abstract: We review evidence on the effectiveness of the minimum wage versus in-work benefit policies in reducing poverty in OECD countries. The most credible evidence suggests that raising the minimum wage is an ineffective policy tool for reducing poverty. On net, minimum wage increases tend to redistribute rather than reduce poverty. In contrast, government subsidies to people who work, through tax credits or transfers, can be appropriately targeted to households with low incomes and lift them out of poverty. Such policies also have the advantage of increasing labor supply, which can offset work disincentives inherent in means-tested benefits that do not require work. These policies, along with pro-growth policies that increase the demand for workers, can increase the household incomes of workers without the negative employment effects of minimum wage increases.

Keywords: Economics and Finance; Sociology and Social Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.elgaronline.com/doi/10.4337/9781839106958.00024 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:elg:eechap:19758_17

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.e-elgar.com

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Chapters from Edward Elgar Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Darrel McCalla ().