Theoretical and ethical reductionism and the neglect of subjectivity in economics and economic education

Giancarlo Ianulardo and Aldo Stella

Chapter 11 in Handbook of Teaching Ethics to Economists, 2023, pp 163-187 from Edward Elgar Publishing

Abstract: The dominant ethical stance in economic analysis, especially in microeconomics, is grounded on a reduction of human behaviour to utility maximisation. We explore the concept of utility which is central to economic analysis, and investigate the significant semantic shift that it has undergone from the “old” to the modern “Max U” approach. It is shown that both the “old” and “new” concept of utility are reductionist, with the modern version being a more radical reductionism. The latter has replaced truth with the useful (i.e., utility maximisation), forgetting the theoretical philosophical dimension of ethics, and replaced subjectivity with individuals’ preferences. Against this, in this chapter, a theoretical philosophical perspective on economics is adopted that permits the recovery of intentional, goal-oriented behaviour and its representation in economic theory.

Keywords: Economics and Finance; Teaching Methods; General Academic Interest (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.elgaronline.com/doi/10.4337/9781802207163.00015 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:elg:eechap:21269_11

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.e-elgar.com

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Chapters from Edward Elgar Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Darrel McCalla ().