The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity Revisited
Josh Lerner and
Scott Stern
in NBER Books from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc
JEL-codes: O31 O33 O34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
Note: PR
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (54)
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Chapters in this book:
- Introduction to "The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity Revisited" , pp 1-23

- Josh Lerner and Scott Stern
- Why was "Rate and Direction" So Important? , pp 27-34

- Nathan Rosenberg and Scott Stern
- Some Features of Research by Economists on Technological Change Foreshadowed by "The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity" , pp 35-41

- Richard Nelson
- The Economics of Inventive Activity over Fifty Years , pp 43-48

- Kenneth Arrow
- Funding Scientific Knowledge: Selection, Disclosure and the Public-Private Portfolio , pp 51-103

- Joshua Gans and Fiona Murray
- Comment on "Funding Scientific Knowledge: Selection, Disclosure and the Public-Private Portfolio" , pp 103-105

- Suzanne Scotchmer
- The Diffusion of Scientific Knowledge across Time and Space: Evidence from Professional Transitions for the Superstars of Medicine , pp 107-155

- Pierre Azoulay, Joshua Graff Zivin and Bhaven N. Sampat
- Comment on "The Diffusion of Scientific Knowledge across Time and Space: Evidence from Professional Transitions for the Superstars of Medicine" , pp 156-160

- Adam Jaffe
- The Effects of the Foreign Fulbright Program on Knowledge Creation in Science and Engineering , pp 161-197

- Shulamit Kahn and Megan MacGarvie
- Comment on "The Effects of the Foreign Fulbright Program on Knowledge Creation in Science and Engineering" , pp 197-200

- Paula E. Stephan
- Schumpeterian Competition and Diseconomies of Scope: Illustrations from the Histories of Microsoft and IBM , pp 203-271

- Timothy Bresnahan, Shane Greenstein and Rebecca M. Henderson
- Comment on "Schumpeterian Competition and Diseconomies of Scope: Illustrations from the Histories of Microsoft and IBM" , pp 271-276

- Giovanni Dosi
- How Entrepreneurs Affect the Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity , pp 277-315

- Daniel Spulber
- Comment on "How Entrepreneurs Affect the Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity" , pp 315-318

- Luis Cabral
- Diversity and Technological Progress , pp 319-356

- Daron Acemoglu
- Comment on "Diversity and Technological Progress" , pp 357-360

- Samuel Kortum
- Competition and Innovation: Did Arrow Hit the Bull's Eye? , pp 361-404

- Carl Shapiro
- Comment on "Competition and Innovation: Did Arrow Hit the Bull's Eye?" , pp 404-410

- Michael Whinston
- Did Plant Patents Create the American Rose? , pp 413-438

- Petra Moser and Paul Rhode
- Comment on "Did Plant Patents Create the American Rose?" , pp 438-442

- Jeffrey L. Furman
- The Rate and Direction of Invention in the British Industrial Revolution: Incentives and Institutions , pp 443-479

- Ralf R. Meisenzahl and Joel Mokyr
- Comment on "The Rate and Direction of Invention in the British Industrial Revolution: Incentives and Institutions" , pp 479-482

- David C. Mowery
- The Confederacy of Heterogeneous Software Organizations and Heterogeneous Developers: Field Experimental Evidence on Sorting and Worker Effort , pp 483-502

- Kevin Boudreau and Karim R. Lakhani
- Comment on "The Confederacy of Heterogeneous Software Organizations and Heterogeneous Developers: Field Experimental Evidence on Sorting and Worker Effort" , pp 502-505

- Iain Cockburn
- The Innovation Fetish among the "Economoi": Introduction to the Panel on Innovation Incentives, Institutions, and Economic Growth , pp 509-514

- Paul David
- Innovation Process and Policy: What Do We Learn from New Growth Theory? , pp 515-520

- Philippe Aghion
- The Consequences of Financial Innovation: A Counterfactual Research Agenda , pp 523-575

- Josh Lerner and Peter Tufano
- Comment on "The Consequences of Financial Innovation: A Counterfactual Research Agenda" , pp 576-578

- Antoinette Schoar
- The Adversity/Hysteresis Effect: Depression-Era Productivity Growth in the U.S. Railroad Sector , pp 579-606

- Alexander Field
- Comment on "The Adversity/Hysteresis Effect: Depression-Era Productivity Growth in the U.S. Railroad Sector" , pp 606-609

- William Kerr
- Generality, Recombination, and Reuse , pp 611-656

- Timothy Bresnahan
- Comment on "Generality, Recombination, and Re-Use" , pp 656-661

- Benjamin Jones
- The Art and Science of Innovation Policy: Introduction , pp 665-667

- Bronwyn H. Hall
- Putting Economic Ideas Back into Innovation Policy , pp 669-672

- R. Glenn Hubbard
- Why Is It So Difficult to Translate Innovation Economics into Useful and Applicable Policy Prescriptions? , pp 673-678

- Dominique Foray
- Can the Nelson-Arrow Paradigm Still Be the Beacon of Innovation Policy? , pp 679-684

- Manuel Trajtenberg
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberbk:lern11-1
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
https://www.nber.org ... e-activity-revisited
Access Statistics for this book
More books in NBER Books from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().