The Presuppositions of NLP

Paul Tosey and Jane Mathison
Additional contact information
Paul Tosey: University of Surrey
Jane Mathison: University of Surrey

Chapter 9 in Neuro-Linguistic Programming, 2009, pp 97-110 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract Two common questions asked about NLP are, does it have any theory; and what is distinctive about it? Many NLP practitioners would probably agree with McDermott & O’Connor, that ‘the root of NLP’s individuality lies in its presuppositions’ (1996:58).1 What are these and where did they originate? Do they indicate that NLP has any theoretical basis?

Keywords: Logical Type; Cybernetic System; Requisite Variety; Logical Derivation; Information Processing Activity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-24831-1_9

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9780230248311

DOI: 10.1057/9780230248311_9

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().