The lying game

Trevor Morris and Simon Goldsworthy

Chapter Chapter 4 in PR — A Persuasive Industry?, 2008, pp 49-60 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract In 2007, in conjunction with PR Week, the authors organized a debate at the University of Westminster on the motion “PR has a duty to tell the truth.” Over three hundred people — PR students from all over the world and UK-based PR practitioners — attended the event in central London. After an hour and a half of lively discussion, with plenty of interventions from the floor, the motion was voted down by a narrow margin: the audience concluded that PR people did not have a duty to tell the truth.

Keywords: Press Agent; Potential Client; Conspiracy Theory; Television Series; Newspaper Editor (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-59485-2_4

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9780230594852

DOI: 10.1007/978-0-230-59485-2_4

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().