 Methodological Dichotomy in the Studies of Knowledge Spillovers: CEE Region Under FocusPaula Puskarova ()
A chapter in Knowledge Spillovers in Regional Innovation Systems, 2018, pp 253-286 from Springer Abstract: Abstract The recent years have witnessed increasing efforts to solve the puzzle around knowledge capital and externalities it appears to unfold. Clearly, the concept of prompting growth through acquiring knowledge for free is appealing. Still, there is no consensus on the significance and magnitude of the estimated impacts of knowledge externalities. The ambiguity might be caused by the lack of methodological unity. A large cohort of scientists advocate capturing knowledge spillovers alongside the movements of production or production factors—considered as channels of knowledge transfers—while others see true value of transferred knowledge in productivity increases registered at proximity to some knowledge production. In the latter case, distance matters more than mere transfer of a product and thus the approach might be quoted as spatial. In this chapter, we discuss major contributions to the field of knowledge spillover studies made while taken both approaches, point to some advantages and pitfalls attached, and address some directions how to steer the research of knowledge spillovers further. Date: 2018 There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:adspcp:978-3-319-67029-4_9 Ordering information: This item can be ordered from DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67029-4_9 Access Statistics for this chapter More chapters in Advances in Spatial Science from Springer |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.