Infrastructure Productivity with a Long Persistent Effect

Tsukai Makoto and Kobayashi Kiyoshi ()
Additional contact information
Tsukai Makoto: Hiroshima University
Kobayashi Kiyoshi: Kyoto University

Chapter Chapter 12 in New Directions in Regional Economic Development, 2009, pp 197-219 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Appropriate investment and management of infrastructure is an important issue in national or regional planning. Aschauer (1989) reported two important findings: that infrastructure productivity was significantly higher than expected, and that fewer investments in the USA after 1970 would result in less growth of national productivity. Since then, measurement of infrastructure productivity has become a focal issue in national or regional management policy, and a large number of empirical studies have accumulated; see Sturm (1998). An aggregate production function approach for time-series applied in Aschauer’s study, however, was criticized by economists, or econometricians. Among the assumptions inherent in the production function approach, “constant return to scale” and “competitive input factor market” are often viewed with suspicion from the viewpoint of the endogenous growth theory by Romer (1986) and Lucus (1988) or from an uncompetitive structure of infrastructure market, respectively. Basu and Fernald (1997) empirically tested these assumptions with the production function approach, based on data from 34 sectors of US industries. They concluded that in some segmented sectors of industry, the constant return to scale assumption was violated but that it held true in most sectors. Holtz-Eakin and Lovely (1996) analyzed the effect of infrastructure on economic activities by using a general equilibrium system explicitly considering scale economies. They showed that infrastructure decreases the input factor cost, increases the variety of industries, and increases the number of newly founded companies. Haughwout (2002) applied the spatial equilibrium theory considering regional monopolistic power over input factor market, and measured infrastructure productivity. This study showed that infrastructure provided significant marginal benefit on regional economic activities. Most studies have reported that there is a positive production/cost reduction effect caused by infrastructure, but unfortunately, some studies have paid little attention to the data generation process that significantly influences findings through model specifications. Recent American, European, and Japanese studies about the production function approach have been widely reviewed by Ejiri et al. (2001).

Keywords: Private Capital; Persistent Effect; Residual Series; Gross Regional Product; Production Function Approach (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:adspcp:978-3-642-01017-0_12

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783642010170

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-01017-0_12

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Advances in Spatial Science from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().