Why Do Countries Pursue Reciprocal Trade Agreements? A Case Study of North America

Michael Kouparitsas ()

Chapter 4 in Trade, Networks and Hierarchies, 2002, pp 41-63 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Despite the considerable effort that has been directed to global trade agreements, such as the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, much of the trade liberalization achieved in the postwar era has in fact come from far-reaching reciprocal regional trade agreements that have involved just a few players. Early regional trade pacts, such as the European Union (EU), involved countries of roughly equal size, while the trend over the last decade has been for regional agreements that bring together one or more small countries and a large country or an established free-trade zone.1,2 This trend has captured the attention of trade theorists because while trade theory argues that the best course of action for large countries may be reciprocal trade agreements, it also argues that the best course of action for a small country is always unilateral trade liberalization.3

Keywords: Gross Domestic Product; Trade Agreement; Trade Liberalization; Intermediate Good; North American Free Trade Agreement (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:adspcp:978-3-662-04786-6_4

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783662047866

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-04786-6_4

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Advances in Spatial Science from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().